Update on Urbacon Litigation Issues for #Guelph
Final actions in Urbacon litigation settled
Resolution marks end of litigation
Guelph, ON, June 26, 2015 – The City of Guelph has settled the final two actions from the Urbacon litigation, bringing the litigation to a complete and final conclusion.
“As promised, we’re now in a position to share the outcomes of these final two actions regarding the Urbacon litigation,” says Guelph’s mayor Cam Guthrie.
One of the actions was with Aviva, the project insurer. The other was with architects Moriyama & Teshima Architects (MTA). The City will pay $100,000 to Aviva, and MTA will pay $150,000 to the City of Guelph, offsetting the overall cost of the settlement by $50,000 for a total of $5,800,837.
Mayor Guthrie acknowledges it will now be for Council to discuss how and if it will replenish the City’s own reserve fund and, in so doing, determine how the City budget will be affected moving forward. A staff report on repayment options is scheduled to come before Council in July.
With the final actions resolved, the City has extended its own full accounting analysis and will be engaging an independent third party to conduct a capital cost audit. “Both the CAO and I feel the community requires assurance of the full accounting on this file,” says Mayor Guthrie. “Therefore, a third party audit will be conducted, the results of which will be fully shared with our residents.”
In the meantime, final settlement and legal costs can be seen here.
Finally, in August, Ann Pappert, Guelph’s chief administrative officer, will share findings from a third-party review she initiated regarding complex capital projects. “There’s a lot we’ve learned from this process,” says Pappert. “I look forward to sharing what we’ve learned with Council and our community in August, and to applying that knowledge to large-scale projects moving forward.”
“I’m very pleased this litigation has come to a close,” says Mayor Guthrie. “The community is still owed three more pieces: a full accounting of the project, a review of the options with respect to repaying our reserve, and the findings from our review of complex capital projects. With these three parts in hand, we can truly say we’ve moved past this issue and that’s a positive thing for our community.”
The City issued a Statement of Claim against Aviva in November 2008 for failing to pay on the construction project’s performance bond. The following September, the City filed a Statement of Claim against MTA for contribution and indemnity, and professional negligence.